Sunday, March 31, 2024

Coleridge's Biographia Literaria - Summary and Analysis II S. T. Coleridge's Theory of Imagination


 
Ransom rightly avers:

“Coleridge is perhaps the best practitioner of criticism that we have in the classics of our language.”

I. A. Richards considers him as “the fore-runner of the modern science of semantics”, and Rene Wellek is of the view that he is a link, “between German Transcendentalism and English Romanticism.”

 Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) is hailed as a great poet, but a greater critic. He is one of the greatest of poet-critics that England has ever produced. He occupies, without doubt, the first place among English literary critics. Ha has been eulogized as “a logician, metaphysician and bard.” E. Albert calls him as, “A giant in the rank of English critics.” Herbert Read coruscates him as the “head and shoulder above every other English critic.” He has pioneered a new theory of imagination. Coleridge is considered as the first English critic to link psychology with poetic creation.

 

HIS CRITICAL WORKS:

Coleridge has expressed his critical comments here and there in many of his works The Friend, Table Talks, Letters, Aids to Reflections, Confessions of an Inquiring spirit, Animal Poteau and Sibylline Leaves. But the most important critical comments of Coleridge are found in his two major critical documents as under:

(1)     Biographia Literaria

(2)     Lectures on Shakespeare and other poets.

 

Coleridge’s ‘Biographia Literaria’ published in 1817 is a unique landmark in the history of English criticism. Written in two volumes, it bears his innovative theory of Imagination.

 

DEFINITION & FUNCTIONS OF POETRY:

Coleridge begins by explaining his concept of poetry. He defines poetry as:

“A poem is that species of composition which is opposed to the works of science by proposing for its immediate object pleasure, not truth.”

Coleridge opines that a good poem should aim at pleasure and not truth. Poetry is opposed to science. Science deals with truth. A good poem as a whole should lead the reader towards pleasure. And the process of providing should be natural, not mechanical.

 

POETRY, PHILOSOPHY & PSYCHOLOGY:

William Walsh calls him:

“A critic with a poet inside him and a philosopher at his back.”

George Watson also remarks about ‘Biographia Literaria’:

“It has the merit of balancing three great interests of his career – poetry, philosophy and psychology.”

Coleridge was the first critic to introduce psychology and philosophy into literary criticism. He was interested in the study of the process of poetic creation, the very principles of creative activity, and for his purposes freely drew upon philosophy and psychology. He thus made philosophy the basis of literary inquiry, and thus brought about a union of philosophy, psychology and poetry.

 

PROSE Vs POETRY & USE OF METER:

Coleridge’s views on poetry are elaborately presented in Chapter XIV of ‘Biographia Literaria’. After defining poetry, he moves on to show the difference between prose and poetry. According to him, a poem contains the same elements as that of a prose composition. Both use words. Hence, the difference between prose and poetry does not lie in the use of medium; rather it lies in the different use of words and the object. The essential difference lies in the combination of the medium (words) and the content (thought).

Moreover, Coleridge says that the only use of meter does not make a good poem. Look at this example:

 

“Thirty days hath September,

April, June and November.”

 

Above two poetic lines (?) provide pleasure but does not contain any serious thought or content. So it is not poetry.

 

Meter is very important in poetry; but this meter or rhyme should not be superadded or imposed on poetry. For this he asks a question, “Suppose meter is added to the novels and other works of prose, do they become poetry?” The answer is “NO”. Meter and rhyme should be so absorbed with the thought and content that finally it leads to the “soul of the poet” and leads to pleasure.

 

POEM Vs POETRY:

Poem – Short? / Poetry – Long? No.

“A poem of any length neither can be nor ought to be, all poetry; size does not decide the quality. It doesn't determine prose or poem too.”

 

Generally, the students of literature do not distinguish between ‘poem’ and ‘poetry’. These two terms look similar. But it was Coleridge who for the first time drew a clear line between ‘poem’ and ‘poetry’. According to him, the activity of the ‘poet’s’ mind is called ‘poetry’ and the verbal expression of that activity is called a ‘poem’. The poetic process or activity which goes on in the poet’s mind is governed by his imagination. So the process of writing poetry is actually the process of imagination. (Dissolving, defusing and dissipating)

 

David Daiches also points out that ‘Poetry’ for Coleridge is a wider category than that of “poem”, that is poetry is a kind of activity which can be engaged in by painters or philosophers or scientists and is not confined to those who employ metrical language, or even to those who employ language of any kind. Poetry, in this larger sense brings, “the whole soul of man”, into activity. This takes place whenever the “secondary imagination” comes into operation.

 

PRIMARY & SECONDARY IMAGINATION:

Imagination is the heart and soul of the poetic creation. Coleridge calls imagination “a magical and synthetic power.” He further writes:

 

“The Imagination then I consider either as primary, or secondary. The primary Imagination I hold to be the living Power and prime Agent of all human perception.”

 

According to Coleridge, imagination has two forms – primary and secondary. Primary imagination is merely the power of receiving impressions of the external world through our five senses. The impressions are restored and kept together in our mind with the help of primary imagination. This primary imagination is possessed by every human being on this earth. It is universal.

 

But the secondary imagination may be possessed by only a few. It is an innate gift of the artist. It is only the secondary imagination which makes artistic creation possible. It is also known as ‘esemplastic’ (to shape into one) as it has “the power of shaping and modifying”. It has the power to reshape the impressions of the external objects into something which we never see in the real external world. It is an active agent which “dissolves, diffuses and dissipates (disappear) in order to recreate”.

 

Secondary imagination fuses together the impressions and opposite forces and merges or shapes them to create something new. It fuses past and present, concrete and abstract, finite and infinite.

 

FANCY:

Coleridge writes:

“Fancy, on the contrary, has no other counters to play with, but fixities and definites. The Fancy is indeed no other than a mode of memory.”

According to him, fancy is also useful in the process of poetic creation but it is more mechanical than artistic. It is only with the help of fancy that the poet makes use of various figures of speech like simile, metaphor and other technical aspects in order to make his creation more pleasing.

 

Coleridge puts forward his final remark at the end:

 

“Finally, GOOD SENSE is the BODY of poetic genius, FANCY its DRAPERY, MOTION its LIFE, and IMAGINATION the SOUL that is everywhere, and in each; and forms all into one graceful and intelligent whole.”

 

CONCLUSION:

Thus, S. T. Coleridge gave his innovative theory of esemplastic or secondary imagination in his very important critical document ‘Biographia Literaria’. He defines poetry, distinguishes between poem and poetry and between prose and poetry in the most convincing manner. He has emphasized the use of meter in poetry, but at the same time argues that meter must have proper natural relation with the content. But his most important contribution to English criticism is his theory of imagination.

Coleridge is indeed the first English critic who based his literary criticism on philosophical principles. David Daiches points out:

"It was Coleridge who finally, for the first time, resolved the age old problem of the relation between the form and content of poetry."

Saintsbury eliminated one after another of possible contenders for the title of greatest critic and concluded:

“So, then there abide these three

– Aristotle, Longinus and Coleridge.”


Click to watch a video lecture.


 

No comments:

Post a Comment

સ્થિતપ્રજ્ઞના લક્ષણો

  સ્થિતપ્રજ્ઞ ના લક્ષણો ભગવદ ગીતા માં "સ્થિતપ્રજ્ઞ" નો અર્થ છે જેનું મન સંપૂર્ણ રીતે સ્થિર , શાંત અને જ્ઞાનમાં એકરૂપ છે. આ શબ્દન...