We read criticism because we wish to understand and enjoy the
author’s works in a better way. Criticism helps the readers and the authors as
well. But as the students of literature, we must also focus on the personal and
historical aspects of criticism. No critic lives in a vacuum. His critical
comments are always partially coloured by his own personality. Moreover, change
of time or age too plays an important role in criticism. So we must also
consider the historical aspects of criticism.
PERSONAL ASPECTS OF CRITICISM:
1. Every critic has his own ideology or
theory. He follows one particular theory and examines the author’s works from
that perspective only. Hence, different critics believing in different theories
come out with different judgments. This may be confusing for the readers
sometimes and may also be beneficial as the readers gain different
interpretations from different critics which enhance the reader’s own
understanding.
2. The personal opinions of the critics
on a work of art are sometimes politically prejudiced which misleads the
readers.
3. The critic’s comments on a work of
art hinder the original meaning of the text. It also stops the readers from
thinking from their own perspectives.
HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF CRITICISM:
1. One critic’s comments on literature
in one age changes from the other critic’s comments on the same literature.
This is so because, with the passage of time, the ideologies, likes and
dislikes of the people keep on changing from time to time. What was held dear
to the Elizabethan audience may not be good for the audience in the modern
world.
2. John Bunyan’s ‘Pilgrim’s Progress’
proved to be a failure during the 17th century. Hume rejected this
work as the worst piece of literature. But the same work became highly popular
and influential during the 19th and 20th century.
Macaulay (19th century) called it a wonderful book. Gosse (20th
century) calls it as perfect in its kind.
No comments:
Post a Comment