Contrast
between Modern poetry & Movement Poetry
The
term “Movement Poetry” was coined by J. D. Scott (the editor of ‘The
Spectator’) in 1954. The poetry of the 1950s was anew and different from that
written in 1920s to 1940s. This new poetry was a reaction against the poets
like T. S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, Dylan Thomas and others. The major Movement Poets
of the 1950s were Philip Larkin, Kingsley Amis, Elizabeth Jennings, Thom Gunn,
John Wain, D. J. Enright and Robert Conquest.
FEATURES OF MOVEMENT
POETRY:
1.
The Movement Poetry was a reaction against spontaneous
outburst of feelings and emotion. It appealed more to the head than to the
heart of readers.
2.
It focused more on presenting harsh realism after the World
War II.
3.
They took the world as materialistic and fundamentally evil.
They did not lament for the loss of glory of human life as was done by Eliot in
‘The Wasteland’.
4.
The Movement Poets preferred writing poetry in traditional
metrical from and syntax. This was a reaction against the free verse style of
modern poetry.
5.
They neglected over-experimentation of the modern poets. They
stressed more in simplicity and clarity of expression.
6.
They also rejected too much figurative language and too many
allusions and references to and ancient mythologies and philosophies.
7.
They used colloquial speech and irony to express the harsh
realities of life.
Philip Larkin was the
leader of this Movement Poetry.
No comments:
Post a Comment