Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Semantics and Pragmatics, Speech Act Theory, Cooperative Principle

Semantics and Pragmatics

1. Semantics

Semantics is the branch of linguistics that studies meaning in language. It deals with the meaning of words, phrases, and sentences as part of the language system itself. Semantics focuses on literal meaning, that is, meaning that does not depend on context, speaker intention, or situation.

Semantics

- Studies dictionary meaning

- Concerned with sentence meaning

- Meaning is stable and fixed

- Independent of context

Examples:

- "Tree" → a tall plant with trunk and branches

- "The earth moves around the sun." → factual meaning

2. Pragmatics

Pragmatics is the branch of linguistics that studies meaning in context. It explains how meaning changes according to situation, speaker intention, relationship between speakers, and social and cultural factors.

Pragmatics

- Studies speaker meaning

- Meaning depends on context

- Focuses on intention and situation

- Meaning is flexible

Example:

"It’s very noisy here."

Semantic meaning → There is noise

Pragmatic meaning → Close the door / move away / reduce volume

 3. Speech Act Theory


A major development in pragmatics is the Speech Act Theory, proposed by J. L. Austin. He believed that language is not only used to say things but also to do things. In this theory he talks about three types of Acts as follows:

 (a) Locutionary Act – actual words spoken

Example: "I will help you."

(b) Illocutionary Act – intention behind words

Example: promise

(c) Perlocutionary Act – effect on listener

Example: listener feels relieved

4. Cooperative Principle

H. P. Grice has discussed about cooperative principles. Grice stated that effective communication depends on cooperation between speakers and listeners, and this cooperation is guided by four conversational rules called Maxims. There are four maxims as follows:

1. Maxim of Quantity

2. Maxim of Quality

3. Maxim of Relation

4. Maxim of Manner

1. Maxim of Quantity – Be Informative

This maxim says:

  • Give as much information as needed.
  • Do not give too little information.
  • Do not give too much unnecessary information.

The speaker should provide the right amount of information — not less, not more.

Example:

“The library is next to the office.”

Explanation:

If someone asks, “Where is the library?”
This answer is:

  • Sufficient → It tells the exact location.
  • Not excessive → It doesn’t give extra irrelevant details like building color, floor number, or history.

Violation Example:

“Somewhere in the campus.” → too little information
“The library is next to the office, built in 1998, with 3 floors and 20,000 books.” → too much information

2. Maxim of Quality – Be Truthful

This maxim says:

  • Say only what you believe is true.
  • Do not say what is false.
  • Do not say things without evidence.

In short: Don’t lie. Don’t guess. Don’t mislead.

Example:

“The exam is on Friday.”

Explanation:

This follows the maxim if:

  • The speaker knows the exam is actually on Friday.
  • The information is reliable and confirmed.

Violation Example:

“The exam is cancelled” (when it is not cancelled)
“I think the exam is on Friday” (without checking)

3. Maxim of Relation (Relevance) – Be Relevant

This maxim says:

  • Your answer should be related to the topic.
  • Do not change the topic unnecessarily.
  • Do not give irrelevant responses.

Example:

Question: “Did you finish your homework?”
Answer: “Yes, I completed my homework.”

Explanation:

The answer is:

  • Direct
  • Relevant
  • Connected to the question

Violation Example:

Q: “Did you finish your homework?”
A: “The weather is very nice today.”

This breaks the maxim because the response is irrelevant.

4. Maxim of Manner – Be Clear

This maxim says:

  • Be clear
  • Be simple
  • Be orderly
  • Avoid ambiguity, confusion, and complexity

It focuses on how something is said, not what is said.

Example:

“Turn left after the temple.”

Explanation:

This instruction is:

  • Clear
  • Simple
  • Easy to follow
  • Not confusing

Violation Example:

“Proceed in a non-linear direction after encountering a religious structure.” (Too complex and unclear)

“Go there and then turn somewhere.”
(Vague and confusing)

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Discourse Analysis

  Discourse Analysis Definition of Discourse Analysis Discourse analysis   is the study of language in use . It does not study isolated wo...