HISTORY/PHASES OF LITERARY CRITICISM
1. HELLENIC CRITICISM (5th, 4th Cen BC in Athens):
The term “Hellenic” comes from the word “Hellas” which
means “Greek”. In ancient Greece, criticism is said to have begun with literary
creations. Athens was the center of literary and critical activity during the 5th
and 4th centuries BC. Plato and Aristotle were the most important
critics in literature. Aristotle is the first scientific critic, theorist who
published ‘Poetics’, a comprehensive critical document on poetry and drama. ‘Poetics’
has been the most influential critical document from which all other subsequent
theories have been formed by the succeeding critics.
2. HELLENISTIC PHASE (3rd BC to
1st Cen AD in Egypt):
"Hellenistic" is distinguished from
"Hellenic" in that the latter refers to Greece itself, while the
former encompasses all ancient territories under Greek influence. By the end of
the 3rd century BC, there was a decline in Athenian culture and
creative art. Now Athens is no longer the center of creative activity. Now the
new center of art, literature and culture was developing vastly in Alexandria
in Egypt. Though not much creative output was done in this period, there were
scholars and thinkers who were devoted to preserve the old texts, and were busy
classifying the ancient texts and were doing research on them. Whatever little
literature was produced, was the mostly the imitation of the previous authors.
3. GRECO-ROMAN PHASE (1st to
5th Cen. AD, in Rome):
The decadent Hellenistic phase was soon followed by
the brilliant Graeco-Roman period. Now, Rome was the capital of the Roman
Empire. The scholars are inspired by ancient Greece and wanted to equal and
excel. They aimed at originality in their age. Criticism largely consisted of
elaboration, interpretation, and application of rules laid down by Aristotle.
The purity of Aristotle was colored and clouded by Horace, Quintillion,
Longinus, and more.
4. THE DARK MIDDLE AGES (6th
to 14th Cen):
Roman Empire broke up in fifth century A.D. confusion
and dislocation prevailed. The rich literary treasures was almost neglected and
forgotten. Literature was frowned upon as sensuous and pagan and grammar,
rhetoric and logic were given more importance. There was a spread of
Christianity and now literature was studied and read from a theological point
of view only. Aesthetic beauty and high literary merits of ancient literature
were highly ignored. The only ray of hope was Dante in Italy who struggled hard
to propagate his theory of ‘De Vulgari Eloquentia’ Illustrious Vernacular (1304-1305).
5. RENAISSANCE (15th to 17th
Cen):
Constantinople fell to Turks in 1453 and there was a
huge rise of literary and critical activity. It was the end of medievalism and we
see a renewal of zest for life and the enjoyment of beauty. Greek and Roman
works were now translated in almost all languages across Europe and literature
gained a boost because of the invention of typewriting machine.
· Sidney’s
work, ‘Apology of Poetry’ defended art agansit the severe attack of Stephen
Gosson (‘School of Abuse’). He advocated for the importance of art and
literature.
· Samuel
Daniel published ‘Defence of Rhyme’ (1603) writes about the fitness of English
language for rhymed verse. `
· Ben
Johnson wrote ‘Timber’ or ‘Discoveries’ (1641) advocated for rules and
contributed by presenting a new form of comedy.
·
6. NEO CLASSIC CRITICISM
(18th Cen):
Classicism became rigid and stringent with passage of
time. Strict adherence to the rules laid down by Aristotle was advised by the
French critics. The English authors mostly imitated and followed the French art
and literature. John Dryden (‘Essay of Dramatic Poetry’ in 1668), Alexander
Pope, Joseph Addison, Richard Steele, and Dr. Samuel Johnson are some of the
greatest critics during this period.
7. THE ROMANTIC PHASE
(1798-1830):
French revolution (1789) and German idealism had an
effect on England and a new phase of Romanticism began in the beginning of 19th
century. Hollow rules were discarded. The authors aspired for freedom of
writing. Subjectivity, love for nature, individualism and freedom from rules
were the chief tenets of Romanticism/ The major writers were Wordsworth’s ‘Preface
to the Lyrical Ballads’ (1801) and Coleridge’s ‘Biographia Literaria’ (1817),
P. B. Shelley’s ‘Defence of Poetry’ (1821) explored new theories on poetic
diction and imagination.
8. VICTORIAN CRITICISM
(1830-1900):
Too much freedom and individualism of romantics were
now rejected by the Victorian critics. Once again order and discipline were
established.
· Mathew
Arnold became a major critic who advocated for comparative criticism with his
popular ‘touchstone method’.
· John
Ruskin popularized the relationship between art and morality.
· Walter
Pater became the leading figure of the movement of “Art for art’s sake”.
9. THE MODERN AGE (1900-1945):
The Arnold and Pater traditions continued to be
followed in the beginning of the 20th century. But we witness new developments in
criticism in the hands of following authors and criticis.
· T.
S. Eliot, the Neo-classic tried to correct the faults of impressions by
appealing to tradition and authority.
· Dr.
I. A. Richards developed the study of psychology.
· Dr.
F. R. Leavis is the most competent critics of the Textual school of criticism.
· Virginia
Woolf gave a new concept of ‘streams of consciousness’ in ‘Modern Fiction’.
·
Various literary movements like
symbolism, imagism, formalism, structuralism, psychoanalytic criticism and so
on presented a hotchpotch of approaches in criticism.
10. POST-MODERN AGE (1960 onwards):
Postmodern
critics started reacting against structuralist and formalist approaches of the
previous age.
· Jacques Derrida published his essay
‘Structure, Sign and Play’ and propounded a new critical theory of
Post-Structuralism.
· Roland
Barthes announced the death of the author and gave more importance to the
reader in the interpretation of the work of art.
· Michel
Foucault attempted to show that what most people think of as the permanent
truths of human nature and society actually change throughout the course of
history. He challenged the ideas of Marx and Freud.
No comments:
Post a Comment